Lead-DBS
  • Home
  • About
    • Quickstart Primer (Post-OP MR-Scans)
    • Data & Code inclusion philosophy
    • Quickstart Primer (Post-OP CT-Scans)
    • Deep Brain Stimulation
    • Lead Connectome
    • Publications
    • List of Lead-DBS dependencies
    • Citing Lead-DBS
  • News
  • Contact
  • Help/Support
    • Manual
    • Knowledge Base
      • Atlases/Resources
        • Subcortical Atlases (MNI-Space)
        • Cortical Atlas Parcellations (MNI-Space)
        • Macaque Atlases (MNI-Space)
        • The DISTAL atlas
        • FEM-based VTA model
        • Normative Connectomes
      • Lead-DBS Methods
        • Subcortical Electrophysiology Mapping (SEM)
        • AC/PC to MNI conversion
        • Connectivity Benefit Mapping
      • Other Videos
      • Screenshots
      • Walkthrough-Videos
    • Slack User Channel
    • Forum
  • Workshops
    • Past workshops
      • Berlin 2016
      • Shanghai September 2018
      • Hamburg February 2019
    • Berlin September 2019
    • Machine Learning – Berlin September 2019
    • Brisbane February 2020
  • Download
  • Lead-Connectome
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

What MRI is needed for normalization (reconstruction)?

You are here: Home1 / Forums2 / Support forum ARCHIVED – Please use Slack Channel instead3 / What MRI is needed for normalization (reconstruction)?4

Tagged: normalization

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 06/06/2017 at 10:33 AM #2715
    tsieger
    Participant

    Hi,
    please, is it possible to perform normalization and reconstruction using only one type of pre-operative MRI (e.g. coronal images) and one kind of post-operative MRI (e.g. transversal images), or is there a need to use all of (or at least two of) transversal, coronal, and sagittal post-operative MRI?

    In my scenario, when I’m using pre-operative coronal MRI and post-operative transversal MRI, LeadDBS keeps saying:

    Unnormalized MR-volumes found. Set normalize option.

    in the status lower-left part of GUI even after normalization.

    Does this mean that normalization did not succeed?

    Looking in the ea_checkctmrpresent.m, it seems that LeadDBS expects both the transversal and coronal MRI for proper normalization, otherwise it will never report "Normalized MR-volumes found.":

    
    if exist([uipatdir{1},filesep,prefs.tranii],'file') && exist([uipatdir{1},filesep,prefs.cornii],'file')
        try
        load([uipatdir{1},filesep,'ea_normmethod_applied.mat'])
        nmused=eval([norm_method_applied,'(''check'')']);
    try    set(handles.statusone,'String',['MR-volumes have been normalized with: ',nmused]); end
        catch
    try    set(handles.statusone,'String','Normalized MR-volumes found.'); end
        end
        modality(1)=1;
    end
    

    Thanks for clarification.

    Best,
    Tomas

    06/06/2017 at 12:55 PM #2718
    andreashorn
    Keymaster

    Hi Tomas,

    it is definitely possible to use only one.
    If so, call the preop anat_*.nii (e.g. anat_t1.nii or anat_t2.nii or anat_pd.nii) and the postoperative one postop_tra.nii (no matter if it’s transversal, coronar or whatelse. The postop_tra.nii is the only needed file and if there is only one, one should call it that way.
    It could well be that the status bar is outdated – so never mind what it says. I never pay attention to it much so it could be that the code that controls it is not correct anymore.

    Best, Andy

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The forum ‘Support forum ARCHIVED – Please use Slack Channel instead’ is closed to new topics and replies.

Your Account

Log In
Register

Forum Statistics

Registered Users
130
Forums
1
Topics
185
Replies
607
Topic Tags
81

Subscribe to our newsletter

Latest Tweets

  • Tweet Avatar
    leaddbs
    @leaddbs
    RT @gordonneuro: Excited to announce our newest preprint identifying subnetworks that connect the frontal cortex to striatum within… https://t.co/YiAQkmOGmh

    2h
  • Tweet Avatar
    leaddbs
    @leaddbs
    RT @MichaelOkun: Long term epilepsy DBS outcomes in SANTE study are positive and also showed reduction in SUDEP. Seems important!… https://t.co/noow2bHqEX

    8h
  • Tweet Avatar
    leaddbs
    @leaddbs
    RT @jefffMRI: These figures 🤯🤯 Congrats on an awesome paper and outcomes with the BNST! 🧠 I can see this being a key study that h… https://t.co/qMrA5U71Zh

    4d

Recent Posts

  • Lead-DBS v2.5 out now!
  • Lead-DBS on the cover of NeuroImage
  • Lead-DBS on the cover of Biological Psychiatry
  • Lead-DBS on the cover of Annals of Neurology
  • Crucial methodological updates for Lead-DBS

Archives

  • March 2021
  • September 2020
  • June 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • March 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014

Impressum & Datenschutzerklärung

Scroll to top