no, we implemented a 0-polynomial version of PaCER. For curved leads, I’d recommend to try the PaCER standalone. It’s not really planned to implement support for curved leads since this would also result in a lot of adaptions to our VTA model and microelectrode recording tool, etc. We feel that for most applications (if interest is only on the contacts), a straight model is a good approximation. Of course, curved leads could be interesting if the trajectory itself is of interest (but can be easily calculated using PaCER standalone.
Hope this helps,